Will "branch coverage" be included? Follow
I'm wondering whether dotCover will provide branch coverage?
Example:
if (someValue)
{
// do something
}
If someValue is always true in all tests then the false case is not covered. This is hard to find without branch coverage.
Best regards,
Urs
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Hello Urs!
dotCover 1.0 will have only statement coverage.
Branch coverage is scheduled for the next versions.
It's been six years by now. Will branch coverage ever be implemented?
Got a question about this at the booth today as well. Would be nice to have branch coverage e.g. with one-line if statements, null-coalescing operators etc.
Hello dotCover team,
I am using V2018.1.2. I still am do not see branch coverage, only statement coverage is available.
Is there a version in which statement coverage is available?
Heya!
I'm also very much interested in the branch coverage feature. When can we expect it? :)
Is there any chance that dotCover will ever git branch coverage?
We are doing some automated C# code coverage in Azure DevOps and came across this issue.
10 years later is there any chance that something like this will get some attention.
"Branch coverage is scheduled for the next versions." Very keen to know when that "next version" will be.
I would think after 10 years, this should be available or JetBrains should just tell us they are not going to do it (btw, it works in IntelliJ).
Just ran across this with ternary and null coalescing operators. It's very misleading.
Hi Ruslan Isakiev, Maarten Balliauw,
Version 1.0 is now a while ago, so 'next versions' should already have happened.
As there are more and more handy branch constructs, this would be a very important feature, otherwise the coverage is very misleading and does not help to ensure a minimum of test coverage for all the different branches of a method.
Could you ask the product owner if this is on the roadmap and when it is planned to come true?
Thank you very much
Michael